About Me

Name: roadmaster
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Protesters?

We had to drive through the so-called demonstration for illegal aliens "rights" at Congress and Church, TWICE, on Friday.  It looked liked a hundred or so high school students, taking the opportunity to ditch school.  I couldn't see one mature person, and most of the front line was made up by girls, with fewer boys behind, most likely just hanging out trying to score points with the ladies.  After school, the radio reported that the size had grown and was then disrupting traffic as far as the I-10 frontage road.  

What the heck is TUSD thinking?  When the school district condones students abandoning classes so as to be used in phony demonstrations, they are beyond stupid.  Who runs our schools?  We the taxpayers, or the seditious La Raza group?  Obviously, our children are being used against the will of the people, who are demanding enforcement first and applaud the signing of SB 1070. 

Turning children against parents is a time test communist tactic.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Guv candidate debate

The forum was Sabino HS, and it was organized fairly well, except for all the introductions of the Sabino Young Republicans, the Principal, advisers, teachers, and parents, which was overdone and used up time.  That said, the kids should be commended and we support their efforts.  The format wasn't explained well enough and instead of remaining seated for the questions and standing at the edge of the stage to introduce themselves and again for conclusions, each candidate got up, sauntered around the table, pulled the mike over and paced in front out of the lights, for each question.  Then repeated the process when time was up.  Tedious. 

John Justice did a good job as moderator (timekeeper) although he asked the audience to check his tongue at one point, thinking he may have bitten through it after a particularly dumb answer by Matt Jette.  They should have set up a system of lights for John to turn on and off instead of having him raise his hand like he was requesting a trip to the bathroom.  The questioners were Emil Franzi, Bruce Ash, and Ray Carroll, all impressive in their own right but limited by the some times simplistic questions submitted by the Young Republicans.
 
Jan Brewer's seat remained empty throughout, which is a shame on her, and Dean Martin was late, but came in swinging for the fences.
John Munger and Buz Mills started out like two peas in a pod, being from similar backgrounds and almost identical viewpoints, but Mills worked to separate himself somewhat as the evening progressed.  Matt Jette was an unmitigated disaster!  More on him later.

Each had a major fluff, we thought, except for Jette, whose every answer elicited groans from the audience.  Munger was a little too squishy on the question about temporary work visas for Mexicans.  Mills hit the right note on that one when he unequivocally stated, enforcement first, then talk about visas.   Mills dodged away from the Rosemont mine question, however, when he called it a local issue and nothing to do with the governor office.

Except for being late because of traffic and an accident, Martin was strong on all questions.  His answers were organized, understandable and to the point.  Personally, I thought he got a little carried away with "bi-partisanship" a couple of times.  My definition of that well worn phrase is that is means republicans bend over and surrender their principles.  To me, that has been the biggest problem of the GOP in Washington.

Jette  was a fish out of water.  He is so "moderate" he and Megan McCain must be good buddies.  He was confrontational, condescending, rambling, incoherent and a gaffe a minute - a junior Joe Biden except he wasn't funny.  Besides his irritating habit of punctuating every sentence with "right?" he certainly drove home the point that he has a Phd, and we mere peasants do not!  One of his biggest goofs was rebutting the Prop 100 question (he's in favors-BOO!).  He kept referring to it as Prop 300 and finally after about the fourth time, the audience corrected him.  Generally we found him to be arrogant and petulant with a sense of entitlement and self importance like Rodney Glassman, minus the tall good looks, singing talent and lots of Daddy's money to waste on frivolous things, like running for Gov or Senator.  When asked how he would defeat Terry Goddard, I couldn't keep silent and muttered, "Be his running mate," which got good laughs from those seated around me.  It seems to me you are debating the audience, as well as the other candidates, you may well be in the wrong forum.  He would have been right at home in a dhimmicrat debate.  If he is the "new" GOP, I'm going back to independent.

Generally, Munger was polished and well spoken.  Mills was very likable, but a little too laid back, possibly compensating for nervousness, and not as verbose or organized.  My wife and I gave the slight edge to Martin over the other two (forget Jette-we will).  Martin hit every note and seems to have a deep understanding of the issues and has a good energy. 

We could support wholeheartedly any one of the three conservatives we heard last night.











Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Three cheers for Gov. Brewer

After much thought and prayer, Governor Jan Brewer signed the state legislation today allowing law enforcement to do their job.  The Federal gubmint IS NOT going to control the border, so it is up to the states affected, and AZ has been negatively affected for far too long.  This was the right thing to do, and my Congresscreep, Raul "superMex" Grijalva is doing the wrong thing;  calling for a boycott of the state and people he is elected to represent.  What a FAT, lazy, grease ball, progressive pig!  Go, Ruth McClung!  Get this clown out!

We drove past the "demonstration" at Congress and Church twice today, on the way to and from a Dr.'s appointment.  It looked like ALL high school students, taking a opportunity to ditch school and scream and yell about an issue they have been indoctrinated against by La Raza and their insidious Chicano Studies program.  There were at least a hundred, probably more now as school is out.  Nothing like the thousands who recently attended Tea Parties in downtown Tucson.

We're headed out for the Governor debate at Sabino Canyon HS.  Hoping to meet and greet some of the quality conservatives running.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Isagenix story

Isagenix International has a unique approach to health and wellness.  Instead of attacking the FAT we all carry around, they've devised a complete system of cleansing and nutrition which gets rid of the FAT our bodies store to encapsulate and protect itself from pollutants and toxins which accumulate over a lifetime of chemically laced, bad food and contaminated water.

The FAT will melt off in your first 9 day cleanse, most people losing an average of 10 pounds, with increased energy and enhanced functioning of all organs, including the brain. 

Personally, I'd suffered from chronic indigestion for years, but after only 1 day on Isagenix, my liver function was restored and since May '06 I've taken 3 (three) Rolaids - no kidding!  I used to go through a roll of antiacids daily.

After 3 years on the Men's Wellness maintenance program, consisting of vitamin supplements, anti-oxidants and delicious protein shakes, with an occasional cleanse day, my health is at or higher than when I was in my early 30's and seriously training in the National Guard.  I lost a total of 35 pounds (trucker's butt & gut) in the first year and have been maintaining the exact weight I was when I got out of basic training in 1968.  Very, very few 60 year old men can make that claim.

Click on the bybytoxins.Isagenix.com link and watch some excellent videos.  This stuff IS the answer.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

bybytoxins@isagenix.com

This stuff is GREAT!  It is literally a life saver.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Loyal Democrat nails 'em

Loyal Democrat is a frequent poster on Town Hall Daily whose satirical musings captures the idiocy of dhimmicrat-ick group think so well, others who aren't in on the joke attack him as if he was Mrs. Bill Clinton herself.  His "thoughts" capture the loony left so well, he even gets real democrats posting beneath him, agreeing with his point of view.  It's a hoot!  The best inside joke going on TH.  Check him out:

http://loyaldemocrat.townhall.com/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I've been on a break

I haven't been messing with the blog lately because sometimes the cascade of worldly events can keep us from attending to the mundane activities of everyday life.  I was touched this morning by Mike Adams column at:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MikeSAdams/2007/05/09/judges_636-40

roadmaster writes: Wednesday, May, 09, 2007 10:58 AM
Lovely story, it gave me goosebumps
And it proves that those who seek God, will find him, because He is always near.

The very first time I met my late wife, we were 11 years old. I looked into her eyes and it was like I had been hit with a stun gun; my eyes started watering, there was a roaring in my ears, my tongue swelled in my mouth, and my whole body went numb. I remember thinking, "Is this love at first sight?" Then I thought, "Nah, couldn't be. I'm only 11 years old."

I'm convinced now that God was making me aware of how important this beautiful, blonde haired, blue eyed girl with the sunniest smile I'd ever seen, would be in my life. We flirted and feuded for several years, and I suspected she was just as sweet on me as I was her, but being an awkward preteen in a much more innocent time, I never expressed my feelings, and she eventually moved away. We never forgot each other but didn't keep in touch, either. What a shame.

Forty years later, almost to the day we first met, a classmate of ours contacted me and gave me a link to my childhood sweetheart's website. She now lived close to me and had been diagnosed with a deadly cancer. The site was how she kept friends and family informed of her status, but I was unable to connect and put it aside.

Some months later I was helping this same classmate prepare Thanksgiving dinner at her home in LA, when she asked if I had ever gotten in touch with my sweetheart. She had the link on her computer so I clicked right on, and there was my Sweetie, grown up and and a little sickly, but with the same big, bright smile on a face which simply glowed with faith and trust in God.

I fired off an email to her and got an immediate response - sure, she remembered me. The rest of the day was frantic for my friend, who was afraid my cooking skills would be distracted by running back and forth between the kitchen and the computer. The dinner was a fantastic success and my Sweetie and I agreed to get together when I made it back home the next day.

To make a long story shorter, we reconnected and rekindled our long ago affections for each other, but there was something much deeper. Her illness had strengthened her always abiding faith and my haphazard Christianity was brought into focus. We instinctively knew that God had brought us back together for a reason: she was tasked with setting my shaky beliefs in concrete, and I was directed to give her as much happiness in her remaining time as possible.

We were married very quickly and set about touching each others' lives, and hopefully those around us, as Jesus Christ directs us to do. The overwhelming love and devotion between us was so above anything I had experienced in my life, I finally understood God's Love and what a marvelous gift he has given man and woman if they can bring His Love into their relationship. It amplifies by an immeasurable factor, a low voltage connection by plugging into the most powerful, I believe, force in His creation - Love, which like gravity, can't be seen or explained, but holds the universe together like glue.

She's gone now, and the love she took with her is now a part of Heaven, waiting for me like a 401K that I cannot touch until I retire permanently from my worldly wanderings. I still have the recipe, though, and know it is the best and true one:

Man + Woman + God = Abounding Joy!

Now I wait to see if He is preparing the ingredients to bake that wonderful confection again.





I also enjoyed Michael Medved's column about the North American Union, a silly, spreading conspiracy that is gathering momentum, in spite of lack of evidence: Vhttp://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelMedved/2007/05/09/an_open_letter_to_a_worried_patriot_why_you_neednt_lose_sleep_over_a_north_american_union


roadmaster writes: Wednesday, May, 09, 2007 9:10 AM
NAU?
Doesn't that stand for Northern Arizona University? Yeah, the Lumberjacks in Flagstaff, but that town has become such a bastion of liberal lunacy, there's probably some adherents to this nonsense living there too.

Brought the nutters out with this one Michael. Your efforts don't seem to be dissuading many of these cranks, but prompted me to do a little investigating myself and I find what you say to be true.

This is a flare up of malignant malady which is always present in our society, it seems, Conspirophobia. It can be spread much easier now days by "Typhoid Mary" types with websites and reams of imagination. No real cure exists for those who suffer from it, but the rest of us can be inoculated with a little information and a big dose of common sense.

Keep plugging away, Medved. By exposing this idiocy, you help keep those of us who aren't infected with NAU fever from becoming victims. Stupidity is contagious, and sometimes fatal.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dhimmicraticks Debate? What debate?

Star Parker has a lot of cred with me, and always hits the nail on the head.  But then again, I'm a racist, bigotted, homophobic conservative.  What do I know?

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/StarParker/2007/04/30/first_debate_of_democrats_hillary_loses

roadmaster writes: Monday, April, 30, 2007 8:43 AM
Empty suits/empty heads
I missed the dhimmicraticks debate because I had to scoop out my cats' litter box that evening. From the sound bites I've seen, it looks like my endeavor produced more valuable results than their exercise in futility.

We learned nothing we didn't already know; that these people will stand on their heads and turn themselves inside out to avoid stating their actual beliefs: socialism/good, capitalism and free markets/bad; nanny state/good, personal responsibility/bad; appeasement & cowardice/good, confronting evil/bad; reactive law enforcement/good, proactive military/bad; anti-American United Nations/good, strong national security/bad; MSNBC, CNN, CBS/good, Fox News, Bush, reality/bad.

Hillary was consistent, with her insincere facade, attempting to pander to all-satisfying few. Edwards was vane and silly, also consistent. Gravel was an idiot. Obama opened his suit to reveal that there is actually nothing there; a high school freshman could have done better. Richardson was a total disappointment, losing any credibility he ever had.

These people need to shed themselves of the fools telling them they're the smartest people in the room and walk out into the real world.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Government interference in free market

Excellent piece on how Rep. Barney "My Boy Lollipop" Frank got a bill passed in congress intended to regulate "excessive" compensation packages paid to top corporate CEO's

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/TomBorelli/2007/04/28/just_say_no_to_barney_frank%e2%80%99s_say_on_pay

roadmaster writes: Saturday, April, 28, 2007 8:08 AM
U.S. one-day individual tax haul
at record by Wed. $48.7 billion dollars. Hmmmmm? How did that happen? Must be from the confiscatory tax rates and government interference in the free market. Oh, wait a minute. Didn't tax cuts in the 1920's, 1960's, and 1980's produce more tax revenue? Gosh, I wonder if the tax cuts in 2001 are having the same effect.

Whenever democraps try to force their discredited and mindless socialist equality, like dictating CEO compensation, we always get unintended consequences, as Dr. Borelli so learnedly illustrates in his excellent essay.

Typical liberal insanity! Keep doing the same things again and again, hoping for a different result. The fact that Barney can get this garbage passed is proof of just how poorly our education system teaches basic economics and how easy it is manipulate the misplaced envy of the ignorant working class.

I say BRAVO! to anyone who can pull down $13 million a year. Sounds like the epitome of the American Dream to me. Wish I had the experience and knowledge to command such a package, but I don't. My ingrained work ethic instructs that had a board of directors hired me for that kind of money, and I didn't produce, I shouldn't be surprised if they gave me my walking papers.

Back to reality, the company I quit a while back because their wage was below average and not commiserate with my qualifications, has just given all their drivers a $2.50 an hour raise, across the board. Hmmmm? Wonder what happened there. Hope Barney doesn't hear about it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fred Thompson on sports

I like Fred a lot and hope he gets into the Republican field before long.  I think his values and ideas are a good counter to Rudy, who I like very much for his leadership against Islamofaciism, but not his liberal social views.

Fred has submitted an essay to Town Hall almost everyday this week on various subjects, and today, since it's the weekend I guess, his piece is about the criminal thugs that seem to abound in professional sports and comments on their crazy antics, on the field and off. 

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/FredThompson/2007/04/28/the_nfl_backdraft

roadmaster writes: Saturday, April, 28, 2007 6:25 AM
Watch a grade school game
You'll see the same showboating and celebration, AFTER EVERY PLAY!!! It's disgusting. If most of these little kids would conserve the energy wasted on these shenanigans and channel it into the game, they just might be more successful.

My Dad taught us boys from an early age about a little thing called sportsmanship, and it sure didn't include all the antics we have to put up with nowadays, notably taunting. He found it to be especially obnoxious and explained it with a war analogy; if you've just defeated your "enemy" in a battle and you've got him on the run, why would you want rub his nose in it? That only serves to pizz him off and inspire him to fight back harder.

The sports playing field used to be where you attempted to dominate with superior speed, skill, brains and strategy. Why would you surrender your advantage by stupidly showboating, thereby incurring the fury and wrath of a vanquished foe.

To this day, Tom Landry is one of my heroes because he had CLASS and demanded very high standards of behavior from his players. Any outstanding play executed by one of his teams would be followed by a courteous, polite return of the ball to the referee with an attitude of, "No big deal, that's what I'm being paid to do."

I predicted when the NFL threw out the Landry inspired rules against celebrating and taunting, the quality of the game would diminish, and naturally, the quality of the players.

But that's what happens when thuggish, churlish antics are celebrated by music, movies, video games and now sports. We are becoming a base society and a declining culture. Dad would still be disgusted, and saddened.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

10 Differences between cons and libs

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2007/04/27/10_differences_between_conservatives_and_liberals

Ken in TN in his 11:38 posting stated how he was a moderate democrat who worked behind the scenes with the other side to get things accomplished, while the ideologues battled it out in front of the cameras.  This is a hot thread developing under this column and a lot of fun if you have the time to follow it.  Pay attention to how liberals cut and paste, or throw up a link to a loony left website because they're unable to argue their own points and have to call in reinforcements.

roadmaster writes: Friday, April, 27, 2007 12:58 PM
Ken in TN
Enjoyed your post but I would say you are the rare exception rather than the rule. Most of the liberals I know fall into the "screaming past one another" catagory you describe. They are Myna birds, parroting the party talking points, which are based in half truths, innuendo and false assumptions, concentrating on the minutiae and ignoring the big picture. They make incredible leaps bridging unrelated points and are incapable of a give and take because they deny fact or even reality, which has to be the common ground for any conversation.

Liberals, in general, are incapable of rational debate because they simply aren't rational. They base their beliefs on incorrect or flawed "truths" that are reached by feelings, rather than logic, wishful thinking not actual results. They exist in a "what if" or "if only" fantasy world, refusing to evolve beyond childish narcissism and petulance.

The foremost "feeling" amongst liberals is a venomous hatred of Bush, attributing him with evil genius status in one breath and incredible stupidity the next. I have a sure fire method for determining who is most effective at hitting lib sore points and therefore worthy of my attention; those who are targets of the most invective and shrill slander must be getting too close to their liberal, godless centers.

That stellar list would include Cheney, Limbaugh, Bennett, Coulter, O'Reilly and many more. These are the people who are skilled at pointing out the idiocy (no word is more appropriate) which dominates the current crop of dhimmicraticks. They aren't worthy of being called Democrats, a once noble political party from the past.

The fact of the matter is, many lifelong Democrats are changing their party affiliation to Independent, for the same reason I changed from Republican - we are mostly conservative, not moderate, but reasonable. We are the Moms and Dad, Grammas and Grampas, workers, leaders, members of the VFW and NRA who believe in American exceptionalism and that we are still far and away, the best country God ever gave mankind.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SCOTUS votes for life

Matt Barbers column of the Supreme Court decision last week and a comment by liberalgoodman prompted me to respond, as this is a very sore subject for me:  http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/MattBarber/2007/04/27/life_takes_a_baby_step_in_a_culture_of_death

liberalgoodman writes: Friday, April, 27, 2007 8:16 AM
Not a person
A blastula with dozens of cells is not a person.

roadmaster writes: Friday, April, 27, 2007 9:57 AM
libgoodman
So when does "personhood" begin? If it isn't at the moment of conception or after the fertilized human egg attaches to the wall of the uterus, is it sometime during the first trimester, when the fetus looks just like a tiny person at 8 weeks? Is it during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters, when millions and billions of cells continue to divide and grow into, if not a little person, it sure is an amazing resemblance to a one?

Partial birth abortion is so brutal and cruel, people like you have to deny the baby is a person, much less human, to justify this ghastly procedure. Most liberals I know are completely sympathetic to animals, yet they endorse the bloody and traumatic execution of one of their own kind, simply for personal convenience and embrace the final solution for pizz poor promiscuity planning. Wouldn't it make more sense to plan not to be promiscuous in the first place? Oh, I forget. If it feels good, do it, and if you get caught, this form of murder is acceptable.

We are the only animals who have sex for sex' sake, and that's what we've become, animals. If we can kill our offspring without conscience, what's next? Eating our young?

When you can reduce the most vulnerable of us to that level, you diminish all of us.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

For your information

As a young soldier coming under fire for the first time, I called out for Mommy, but am proud to report that my sphincter control was excellent.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why didn't the victims at Virginia Tech fight back?

Because the first thing that happens when the human animal is attacked by a predator is the triggering of the fight or flight part of their reptilian brains, and the conflict between those choices freezes the prey like a deer in the headlights.

No one knows what their reaction to danger will be and that includes soldiers.  Even after basic and advanced infantry training, that instant when a soldier comes under fire for the first time, two things happen almost simultaneously: calling out for "Mommy" and filling one's pants with poop.  The next thing that follows in a properly trained soldier is anger, at being a baby with poopy pants, turning into fury towards that which caused the other two.  Soldier is now ready to lock and load, select target and engage enemy, within seconds.

Civilians don't undergo this type of conditioning and seldom make it past the frozen with fear stage in a frightening scenario like was created by this murderous little puke, nor can they be expected to.  Because our society has eliminated most of the everyday threats and dangers faced by people in less developed countries, as a whole we no longer feel a need for self-defense.   

I can't speak towards concealed carry courses in other states, but the one I attended here in AZ was excellent, very thorough in hammering home the serious consequences and ultimate responsibility that come from making the wrong choices while defending oneself.  I wouldn't recommend anyone obtain a gun without training in it's function and handling and most important, the proper etiquette for firearms.  Like most Westerners, mine started at age four under the tutelage of my Dad, a WWII veteran who understood completely about kill or be killed, and an ultimate source of wisdom on the human animal as prey and predator.

Everyone has a choice in their own survival - to be either the lion, or the antelope.  Never a fair fight, for certain.  Especially for the "Bambis" of the world.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who reads books nowadays

Kathleen Parker's column yesterday on America's death march to illiteracy developed into an excellent thread of posters, almost all positive with good suggestions on how we can tackle this problem.

roadmaster writes: Wednesday, April, 25, 2007 11:07 AM
Excellent posts
Pamela and especially QParker's.

I know for a fact that the school that I graduated from in the 60's has declined in the quality of it's graduates. They certainly couldn't pass the English and History courses I had to work hard at in those days. Today's professors and teachers were the D students in my time, who elected to seek education degrees which by the 70's, had been diminished to a position lower that the perennial refuge for boneheads and jocks, the PE major.

After gaining a teaching certificate, these underachievers then passed their mediocrity on to their students, who then became the next generation of even dumber educators. Ignorance only produces more ignorance; laziness has created the illiterate dolts who cancel out your ballot.

Everyone no doubt has seen this 1895 8th grade final exam from Salinas, KS:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a385e7b435ce6.htm

Many college students may have passed this test in the 60's but I doubt very few professors could pass it today. Schools in the 1800's were primarily taught by young women who had passed the 8th grade, thereby qualifying them to be teachers with higher academic standards than today's college graduates have to meet by 8 or 10 more years of so-called education.

An 8th grade diploma today is useless, other than to bestow unearned and undeserved self-esteem to graduates, who are so dumb, they don't even know what they don't know. I maintain the same can be said of HS or university degrees. Ask any of them about Martin Luther or Luther Burbank and I will wager you'll get a blank stare.

They'll know who Lex Luther is, though.
And when the thread concentrated on the importance of reading and how parents and teachers can stimulate this lost pleasure, I posted this:

roadmaster writes: Wednesday, April, 25, 2007 4:08 PM
Reading is no longer fundamental
A 20 years ago, while attending my 20th high school class reunion, I toured the school's library, a place I'd spent so many enjoyable hours. I started pulling books from the selves that I remembered reading (I used to read 1-2 books per week) and found that most of them hadn't been checked out since the 60's and my name was the last listed. Some of them, I was the ONLY person to ever check them out, meaning the librarian, Mrs. Elliot, who read every single book she added to the stacks, and myself, were the only people who ever read that book.

Pathetic, and what a waste. This year is my 40th reunion and if I get a chance to go back, how much can I wager that those books are still there, dusty and undisturbed since the last time I pulled it out of the shelf? In addition to most of the classics, this included all of the best sellers of the era. No light airy tomes, either. I was a serious reader.

Funny story about Mrs. Elliot. At age 9, my reading and comprehension tested at 12.4 grade level, so by this time I was reading books out of the adult section. This wonderful old lady noticed me among the "big" books one day and fetched me back to the childrens section, informing me I was out of my area.

I protested that I had already read all of the kiddie books so she started pulling books at random to see if I had, in fact checked them out. After a dozen or so, all with my name in them, she held one out to me. "Aha!" she exclaimed, "You didn't read this one!"

"Nah, that one looked dumb, only for babies," I told her. With that (damn smartalecky kid) she escorted me back into the adult stacks, grabbed a thick book at random, thrust is at me and ordered me to read it out loud, which I did without hesitation.

"That's pretty good," she admitted. "Oh, I read this one already," was my response and opened the inside cover to show her where she had checked it out to me. We had a good laugh together and she promised to start looking up from her desk to see who she was signing books out to after that.

Throughout the rest of my school years, Mrs. Elliot made me one of her "pets" and whenever she'd get an especially good book in for the library, she'd recommend it to me, after she had enjoyed it, of course.

I wonder what librarians do now days, other than making sure the perverts have a connection for their porn.




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »